What is an AI hallucination?
An AI hallucination is an answer from a language model that sounds plausible but is false or not supported by the source it uses: a fact, a quote or a product feature the model states with confidence without it being true. It happens because the model predicts the most likely words instead of looking facts up.
Key takeaways
- A hallucination is a false or unsupported claim that a language model presents as true.
- It happens because the model predicts the most likely sequence of words; it does not retrieve data, even when it sounds sure.
- There are two kinds: one that contradicts the source the model had in front of it, and one that adds something that source does not say.
- Searching the web and citing sources reduces them but does not remove them: Google warns that AI Overviews can make mistakes, and it does.
- On a store, the typical hallucination is a feature the product does not have, or one the product page does not make clear.
In artificial intelligence, "hallucinating" has nothing psychiatric about it: it is the name that stuck for a false answer delivered with total confidence. An assistant that swears your kettle shuts off by itself when it runs out of water, when it does not, is not lying or failing on purpose; it is completing a sentence with whatever seems most probable. For a store the problem is twofold. The shopper gets a wrong fact about your product without ever setting foot on your site, and you do not see the answer: you find out, if you find out, from a return or a question in the support chat.
How it works
Google explains it in its guide to AI-generated content: generative models do not retrieve data, they predict the most likely sequence of words based on what they learned in training, so what they produce can contain errors, known as hallucinations.[1]Google Search Central. Google Search's guidance on using generative AI content on your website An LLM (large language model) has no box that says "I don't know this fact"; it has more and less probable words.
A paper by Adam Tauman Kalai, Ofir Nachum, Santosh Vempala and Edwin Zhang, published on arXiv on September 4, 2025, gives the most cited explanation of why they do not go away. Models behave like a student facing a hard exam question: when they are not sure, they sometimes guess instead of admitting it. According to the authors, training and evaluations reward guessing over admitting doubt, because most benchmarks score that way, and a model optimized to pass exams learns that answering something pays better than not answering.[2]arXiv (Kalai, Nachum, Vempala and Zhang; September 4, 2025). Why Language Models Hallucinate
The research distinguishes two kinds, and the distinction is useful for a store. A reference survey of the problem calls a hallucination intrinsic when it contradicts the source the model had in front of it, and extrinsic when it adds something that cannot be verified against that source: it neither confirms nor refutes it. The authors warn that the extrinsic kind is not always an error, because it can come from outside information that happens to be correct.[3]arXiv (Ji et al.; ACM Computing Surveys). Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation In plain terms: if the assistant read your product page and says something else, it is intrinsic; if it says something your page does not cover, it is extrinsic, and it may be right or wrong.
AI search, which consults the web before answering, helps, but does not fully fix it. Google says so bluntly about its own summaries: AI Overviews can make mistakes, and it does, and it recommends checking important information in more than one place and opening the supporting links.[4]Google Search Help. Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews in Google Search Anthropic, which makes Claude, lists techniques to reduce them, such as letting the model say "I don't know," backing the answer with direct quotes from the documents, or making each claim carry its citation, and adds that they reduce hallucinations but do not eliminate them entirely.[5]Anthropic, Claude documentation. Reduce hallucinations
In a store
A fictional example: a store sells an electric kettle. A shopper asks an assistant with search and gets a recommendation. Here is how each kind of hallucination looks from the store's side:
| What the product page says | What the assistant answers | Type | Where it usually comes from |
|---|---|---|---|
| "Stainless steel interior" | "It has a plastic interior" | Intrinsic: contradicts the source | The assistant mixed up the page with another model's |
| Nothing about dry-boil shutoff (the fact is in a PDF manual) | "It shuts off if it runs out of water" | Extrinsic: the page does not say it | The model filled in with what is usual in the category |
| "Suitable for every kind of kitchen" | "Induction compatible" | Extrinsic, and may be false | A vague phrase the model made concrete in its own way |
The last two rows have something in common: the fact the shopper needed was not written on the page in a way a crawler or an assistant could read. A fact in plain text does not guarantee that no assistant will get it wrong, but it does leave a source to check the answer against, and an extrinsic hallucination is, by definition, one that adds what the source does not say.[3]arXiv (Ji et al.; ACM Computing Surveys). Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation
What gets confused
That an answer that cites your site says what your site says. A citation shows where the assistant got information, not that every sentence is on that page: an intrinsic hallucination is precisely the one that contradicts the source the model had in front of it.[3]arXiv (Ji et al.; ACM Computing Surveys). Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation That is why Google recommends opening the supporting links and checking what matters.[4]Google Search Help. Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews in Google Search
How to check
- Pick the five features you get asked about most and write down, for each one, what your product page says. That is the reference you will check against.
- Ask the assistants about your product, by name, one feature at a time, and note the answer with its date. Repeat the same question in new chats: Anthropic suggests comparing several answers to the same question, because inconsistencies between them can give a hallucination away.[5]Anthropic, Claude documentation. Reduce hallucinations
- Open the sources each answer cites and look for the fact in them, as Google recommends for AI Overviews.[4]Google Search Help. Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews in Google Search If the source is your page and the fact does not match, it is intrinsic; if the fact is not there, it is extrinsic.
- Fix your own side first. If the fact is not on your product page, or is only in an image or a PDF, write it as text. If the wrong answer shows up on Google, send your feedback with the thumbs-down that every AI Overview carries.[4]Google Search Help. Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews in Google Search
- Repeat the check regularly. Clione, for example, asks ChatGPT and Gemini what shoppers ask and links each answer, which is where you read what they say about your products.
Related concept: grounding
Grounding is anchoring a model's answer in specific documents, for example the ones it retrieves from an index with RAG (retrieval-augmented generation), instead of letting it answer only with what it learned. The difference from a hallucination is that of a remedy and a symptom: the hallucination is the failure; grounding is one of the ways to reduce it. Anthropic uses it this way: asking the model to extract direct quotes before answering anchors the answer in the real text and reduces hallucinations, without eliminating them.[5]Anthropic, Claude documentation. Reduce hallucinations An assistant with search does grounding and can still hallucinate, as Google's warning about its own summaries shows.[4]Google Search Help. Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews in Google Search
To keep going, the guide on what an AI crawler sees on your store shows how much of your product page each agent gets to read, and the AI search reading path lays out the rest of the terms.
Synonyms
- English
- AI hallucination, hallucination
- Español
- alucinaciones de la IA, alucinación de IA
Sources
- [1] Google Search Central. Google Search's guidance on using generative AI content on your website. Accessed . ↑
- [2] arXiv (Kalai, Nachum, Vempala and Zhang; September 4, 2025). Why Language Models Hallucinate. Accessed . ↑
- [3] arXiv (Ji et al.; ACM Computing Surveys). Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generation. Accessed . ↑ ↑ ↑
- [4] Google Search Help. Find information in faster & easier ways with AI Overviews in Google Search. Accessed . ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑ ↑
- [5] Anthropic, Claude documentation. Reduce hallucinations. Accessed . ↑ ↑ ↑
Change history
- First English version.
This definition is published under CC BY 4.0. Reuse this definition freely, crediting Clione with a link to this page.
Related terms
Grounding
What grounding is in AI, how it connects a model to a search engine's index, what Google-Extended controls and how to see if your store is used as a source.
LLM
What an LLM is, how it predicts the text it writes, why it makes up facts and what ChatGPT or Gemini do with your store's product page.
RAG
What RAG is in AI, the paper it comes from, how Google and ChatGPT use it to answer with sources, and what part of your product page ends up in the answer.
Embeddings
What embeddings are, how they measure similarity between texts with vectors, what OpenAI and Gemini use and what they do and do not say about your products.
Zero-click search
What a zero-click search is, how many Google searches end without a click, what AI Overviews and AI Mode change, and how to measure it in your store.
AI SEO
What AI SEO is, the two things sold under that name and the rules Google sets for each, from AI Mode to product pages written with AI.
Make your catalog easy for bots to read
Clione fills every product page with what bots read best: the JSON-LD graph with its structured data, the meta description and the FAQs. You review and press Push; then we check your live store so it all stays published.